In addition to the majority opinion, any justice can write a dissenting opinion. The first draft of the opinion is usually done within four weeks. However, decisions are in a multi-month revision process constantly being rewritten and adjusted to try to incorporate differing views or different reasoning behind a supporting view. Majority and minority may flip during this time. These decisions rage from a few pages when the decision is unanimous to over 80 pages when the justices have different opinions.
One thing that was interesting was that they took initiative to set a system in order that everyone shall speak once before anyone speaks twice in the discussion. Something as simple as this policy really allows for more open-minded discussion, making it a more non biased decision.
It’s funny because the interviewer talked about how the Supreme Court is viewed in the minds of the public as this secretive entity when in reality that is not true at all. Behind the scenes is only thoughts and discussions but there truly isn’t a way to have the Supreme Court be secretive in any way. The Supreme Court publishes their thoughts and decision for the entire nation to see and read. They can’t do much without the eyes of the country on them. I really had this subconscious view of the Supreme Court being very secretive and I'm not even certain where that thought initially came from.
People tend to embrace the view that the Supreme Court has the longview of the nation in its mind when make decisions and that it will follow the constitution dedicatedly.
No comments:
Post a Comment